-
Issue description: Hello, when I’m inspecting the homepage it does show schema as part of the code but google search is not showing the associated review numbers as intended. Please let me know how I can fix it. Thank you
-
Link to the page with the widget in question: tridentorthodontics.com
Hi there, @pandaman ![]()
I am sorry to say that rich snippets don’t work with homepages, that’s why you don’t see stars and rating in search results ![]()
It’s a decision by Google to not show the rich snippets on homepages and, unfortunately, there is nothing we can do with it
Please let me know if this clears things up or if you have any questions left ![]()
I have it in other webpages as well but I don’t think they’re showing up. Please have a look:
Got you, thanks for sharing these links!
Our devs will look into this and I’ll update you once I have their response ![]()
The markup doesn’t work because the widget is installed at the very bottom of the page and appears with the delay.
To resolve the issue, please try to remove the data-elfsight-app-lazy attribute from the widget’s installation code or move the 1st line of the widget’s installation code ( <script src="https://elfsightcdn.com/platform.js" async></script>) to your website’s <head>
Try it out and let me know if it helped ![]()
Hi Max, can you please help me check it again? Sorry I must have accidentally taken it off
Hi @pandaman ![]()
I see that the issue still persist. Could you please try to data-elfsight-app-lazy attribute from the widget’s installation code and let me know if it worked?
i think it’s still a problem even after the lazy attribute removal Schema Markup Validator
Hi there, @pandaman ![]()
I’ve checked the page using the rich results test and see that the widget’s markup is working fine now:
Could you please check it once again?
In your screenshot there is a markup that you’ve added to your website’s <head> and it’s not related to our Google Reviews widget:
The markup of the Google Reviews widget is working fine and shows the correct number of reviiews (254).
I hope this clarifies things.
If you have any further questions, I’ll be happy to help ![]()
I see that now. I’ll have to figure it out from my end. Thank you for your help!
No sweat ![]()





