Webhook integration

On integrations, add ‘Webhook’, allowing the user to add a URL and send the data as ‘POST’ with the data formatted as ‘JSON’. This is quite standard and ‘5 minutes to add’.

Don’t expect people to use Zapier. It is expensive. Since you will never add Sendinblue to the integration, at least add Webhook, and many web developers will be happy.

4 Likes

Hello @Stan :wave:

You see, since we get a lot of requests and the process of adding new integrations is not easy, we have to be picky and choose the most popular requests first.

If this request gets more votes, we’ll gladly consider Webhook integration in our future updates.

Thanks a lot for your interest and help, we are always happy to hear from you :wink:

1 Like

This will certainly be the reason why this cannot be a viable form solution for us.

2 Likes

Greetings and welcome to the Community @user13649 :wave:

I do understand your point and really sorry that the Webhook integration isn’t available yet.

We will try to think this opportunity over and hopefully, we’ll be able to implement it in one of the future updates.

A huge thank you for sharing your feedback with us!

Despite popularity of feature requests, webhooks and or API endpoints would definitely produce a hefty set of clients as developers would recommend your product to more end users, and that would outweigh end user votes. Many of your apps need some sort of webhook or api capabilities otherwise they are non dynamic stand alone units.

3 Likes

HI @Bradley_E_Byrd :wave:

A huge thank you for your insightful feedback!

I’ve shared your thoughts with the devs, and we’ll try to explore this possibility in the future :slightly_smiling_face: